Reasoning Quiz 20 July 2020

Directions (1-5): Study the following information carefully to answer the questions given below —

P, Q, S, U, R and T are six friends who studied different languages viz. -Sanskrit, French, Sindhi, Punjabi, English and Hindi but not necessarily in the same order. Each of them likes a different foods viz. sindhi, marwari, chinese, punjabi, raw and south indian, but not in the same order. Each of them lives in different parts of the country viz. Delhi, Punjab, Gujarat, Haryana, Rajasthan and Himachal Pradesh but not necessarily in the same order. The one who likes Chinese food does not live in Delhi. U does not study hindi. R studies sindhi and likes sindhi food. The one who likes raw lives in Rajasthan . S likes chinese and does not study hindi. The one who studied hindi does not live in Delhi or Himachal. Whereas the one who studied sindhi does not live in Punjab. One who like punjabi food studies english. T studies punjabi and does not like south indian. T lives in Gujrat. One who likes raw studies french. P and Q do not like raw. P does not like south indian. P and S lives in either Delhi or Himachal.

1)Which language did Q studied ?
1)Sanskrit
2)Punjabi
3)Hindi
4) English
5) None of these

2)According to the given information which of the following combination of person and place is correct?
1)U-Haryana
2)Q-Delhi
3)S-Himachal
4)T-Rajasthan
5)None is correct

3) Which food categories does P likes?
1)Punjabi
2) Marwari
3)Sindhi
4)Cannot be determined
5)None of these

4)Which of the following food category does T likes ?
1)Punjabi
2)Marwari
3)Sindhi
4)Cannot be determined
5)None of these

5)Which language did U studied?
1)Sanskrit
2) Punjabi
3)Hindi
4)English
5)None of these
Directions (Q. 6-10): In each question below are given two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer
1) if only conclusion I follows.
2) if only conclusion II follows.
3) if either conclusion I or II follows.
4) if neither conclusion I nor II follows.
5) if both conclusions I and II follow.Statements: Some cats are kittens.

6) All dogs are kittens.
No kittens are black.
Conclusions: I. All kittens being cats is a possibility.
II. Some dogs can never be black.

7)Statements: 60% of the government teachers went on strike.
Miss Rani is a government teacher.
Conclusions: I. That Miss Rani went on strike is a possibility.
II. Miss Rani did not participate in the strike.

8)Statements: All scholars are eccentric.
No woman is eccentric.
All eccentrics are studies.
Conclusions: I. No woman is a scholar.
II. All studies being scholar is a possibility.

9)Statements: Some eggs are hard-boiled.
No eggs are uncrackable.
Conclusions: I. Some hard-boiled are uncrackable.
II. No hard-boiled are uncrackable.

10)Statements: Some perfumes reek badly.
All perfumes are expensive.
All expensive things are unique.
Conclusions: I. There is a possibility that all unique things are perfumes.
II. Unique things can never reek badly.

Related posts

Leave a Comment